By Rodrigo Campos
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Stocks fell on Friday hit by news that the economy shrank at its fastest pace in nearly 27 years while economic data and downbeat earnings added to investors' worries about the predicament of industries and consumers.
Highlighting the slowdown in spending, Procter & Gamble Co
U.S. gross domestic product for the fourth quarter fell at a 3.8 percent annual rate that was not as bad as analysts' expectations. Still, it was the biggest drop since 1982's first quarter. In a bad sign for corporate profits, the GDP data showed inventories of unsold goods rose, compared with falls in recent quarters. Economists had forecast fourth-quarter GDP would shrink at a 5.4 percent rate.
"The build-up in inventories muted the decline in GDP, but that becomes a drag going forward," said Eric Kuby, chief investment officer at North Star Investment Management Corp in Chicago.
"It creates concern that it might take longer to get out of this mess."
The Dow Jones industrial average <.DJI> fell 78.61 points, or 0.96 percent, to 8,070.40. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index <.SPX> slid 9.11 points, or 1.08 percent, to 836.03. The Nasdaq Composite Index <.IXIC> lost 15.31 points, or 1.02 percent, to 1,492.53.
P&G shares fell 5.2 percent to $55.19, making it the top drag on the Dow.
The Nasdaq's decline was led by a 2.3 percent slide in Apple
In the S&P 500, the largest drop came from Juniper Networks
Companies in the basic materials sector were the worst performing in the S&P 500, as a 3.2 percent slide in the S&P materials index <.GSPM> weighed the broad index down.
Broad declines threatened to send the S&P 500 down in its worst January in nearly two decades, with the benchmark index off 7.4 percent for the year so far. January performance traditionally serves as a harbinger for stocks for the rest of the year.
On the upside, oil giants Exxon Mobil Corp
U.S. oil futures for March delivery rose 46 cents to $41.90 a barrel at midday in New York, reflecting a pullback from session highs on worries about demand due to a revision in U.S. Energy Information Administration data.
(Editing by Jan Paschal)