Empresas y finanzas

Cinpres Clears Final Legal Hurdle



    Directors of UK company Cinpres Gas Injection were today
    celebrating after winning the longest running battle in the history of
    the English patent courts.

    The company is a market leader in gas injection equipment (used by
    its customers to make plastic products, such as interior trim for
    cars).

    It has spent 16 years attempting to prevent Gibraltar-registered
    company Melea Ltd from claiming ownership of the patent for
    ´spillover´, a process which prevents sink and weld marks in hollow
    plastic objects.

    The inventor, James Hendry, worked at different times for both
    companies. Melea´s owner, litigious Florida businessman Michael Ladney
    (branded a "liar and perjurer" by the judges in today´s ruling)
    claimed Hendry invented the process whilst working for Melea.

    Hendry testified for Melea, then admitted perjury and supported
    Cinpres´s case (he was also branded "a liar and perjurer" by the
    court).

    In October 2006, Mr Justice Mann ruled in favour of Melea, but
    remarked: "...the result might be considered ... as less than
    satisfactory - the entitlement to the patent is governed by a decision
    reached after receiving and accepting perjured evidence, and ... might
    have been different had the truth been told. However, that is the
    effect of the applicable principles..."

    The Court of Appeal decision on January 24 overturns that ruling
    and (barring a House of Lords appeal) blocks further attempts by Melea
    to lay claim to the patent. The ruling contains uncompromising
    language about Ladney and Hendry.

    Cinpres Chairman Merrick Taylor said: "Finally, a judgement
    in-line with natural justice. Innovative companies shouldn´t have to
    fight this hard to protect their rights against people like Mr
    Ladney."

    Gordon Harris, of Wragge & Co, the Cinpres legal adviser, said:
    "The Court of Appeal saw through the legal verbiage which bedevilled
    this case and found that the invention properly belongs to Cinpres."

    For a full judgement go to www.cinpres.com/s37